evaluating objective and protective assessments

  

Evaluating Objective and Projective Assessments

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review Chapters 8 and 9 in your textbook.

In this assignment, you will compare projective and objective methods of personality assessment. Research a minimum of three peer-reviewed articles that were published within the last 15 years on these techniques. In your paper, you will provide an evaluation of these techniques organized according to the outline provided below. Use information from your researched peer-reviewed articles and required sources to support your work in each section.

Section 1: Objective Personality Assessment

Define the term objective in objective methods of personality assessment.

Summarize the features of objective methods of personality assessment, and provide at least three examples of these types of measures.

Explain the assumptions on which objective methods are based, and provide an analysis of empirical research testing the validity of the assumptions you identified.

Appraise the research exploring the technical adequacy (i.e., reliability and validity) of objective tests.

Describe the impact of social and culture variability on the administration and interpretation of objective tests.

Section 2: Projective Personality Assessment

Define the term projective in projective methods of personality assessment.

Summarize the features of projective methods of personality assessment, and provide at least three examples of these types of measures.

Explain the assumptions on which projective methods are based, and provide an analysis of empirical research testing the validity of the assumptions you identified.

Appraise the research exploring the technical adequacy (i.e., reliability and validity) of projective tests.

Describe the impact of social and culture variability on the administration and interpretation of projective tests.

Section 3: Synthesis, Conclusions, and Recommendations

Write a brief one-paragraph scenario for a fictitious client. Include the following information: presenting concerns (reason for referral), age, gender, ethnicity, language(s), and any other significant information (e.g., military status, health issues, marital status, sexual orientation, etc.).

Debate the arguments supporting and opposing the use of projective and objective personality assessments with your identified client.

Select a minimum of one objective and one projective measure to use with your client. Compare the use of the selected projective and objective personality measures with your identified client.

Analyze the advantages and limitations of each assessment measure you selected.

Compose recommendations to improve the validity of personality assessment.

The Evaluation of Objective and Projective Measures of Personality

Must be four double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style. 

Must include a separate title page with the following:

Title of paper

Student’s name

Course name and number

Instructor’s name

Date submitted

Must use at least three peer-reviewed sources published within the last 15 years in addition to the course text.

Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style.

Text

Gregory, R. J. (2014). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

This text is a Constellation™ course digital materials (CDM) title.

E-Books

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Barnhill, J. W. (Ed.). (2014). DSM-5 Clinical Cases. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.

Articles

Ægisdóttir, S., White, M. J., Spengler, P. M., Maugherman, A. S., Anderson, L. A., Cook, R. S., Nichols, C. N.,…Rush, J. D. (2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(3), 341-382. doi:10.1177/0011000005285875

American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [PDF]. American Psychologist, 68(1), 7-19. doi:10.1037/a0029889

Baez, H. B. (2013). Personality tests in employment selection: Use with caution (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Cornell HR Review. Retrieved from 

http://www.cornellhrreview.org/personality-tests-in-employment-selection-use-with-caution/

Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2014a). Case description: Mr. I—Psychiatric inpatientinterpretive report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [PDF]. Retrieved from http://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/Assets/MMPI-2-RF/MMPI-2-RF_Interp_PsyInpatient.pdf

Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2014b). Case description: Mr. M—Forensic, pre-trial criminal score report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [PDF]. Retrieved from http://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/Assets/MMPI-2-RF/MMPI-2-RF_Score_ForensicPretrial.pdf

Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2014c). Case description: Ms. X—Forensic, neuropsychological score report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [PDF]. Retrieved from http://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/Assets/MMPI-2-RF/MMPI-2-RF_Score_ForensicNeuro.pdf

Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2014a). MMP1-2-RF Police Candidate Interpretive Report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.[PDF].

Retrieved from http://downloads.pearsonclinical.com/images/Assets/MMPI-2-RF/MMPI-2-RF-PCIR.pdf

Ekinci, B. (2014). The Relationship among Sternberg’s triarchic abilities, Gardner’s multiple intelligences, and academic achievement. Social Behavior & Personality, 42(4), 625-633. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2014.42.4.625

Elbulok-Charcape, M.M., Rabin, L.A., Spadaccini, A.T., & Barr, W.B. (2014). Trends in the neuropsychological assessment of ethnic/racial minorities: A survey of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(3), 353–361. doi:10.1037/a0035023

Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Morris, R. D., & Lyon, G. R. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of learning disabilities in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34(3), 506-522. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Grove, W. M., & Lloyd, M. (2006). Meehl’s contribution to clinical versus statistical prediction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(2), 192-194. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.115.2.192

Hampshire, A., Highfield, R. R., Parkin, B. L., & Owen, A. M. (2012). Fractionating human intelligence. Neuron, 76(6). 1225–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.022

Handel, R. W., & Archer, R. P. (2008). An investigation of the psychometric properties of the MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales with mental health inpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(3), 239-249. doi:10.1080/00223890701884954

Healthwise Staff. (2014). Mental health assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Retrieved from http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/mental-health-assessment

Hogan, J., Barrett, P., & Hogan, R. (2007). Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1270-1285. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1270

Johnson, R. (2013). Forensic and culturally responsive approach for the DSM-5: Just the FACTS. Journal of Theory Construction & Testing, 17(1), 18-22. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

McDermott, P. A., Watkins, M. W., & Rhoad, A. M. (2014). Whose IQ is it?—Assessor bias variance in high-stakes psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 207-214. doi: 10.1037/a0034832

Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Are we getting fooled again? Coming to terms with limitations in the use of personality tests for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 60(4), 1029-1049.

Peterson, M. H., Griffith, R. L., Isaacson, J. A., O’Connell, M. S., & Mangos, P. M. (2011). Applicant faking, social desirability, and the prediction of counterproductive work behaviors. Human Performance. 24(3), 270–290. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.580808

Randall, J. R., Rowe, B. H., Dong, K. A., Nock, M. K., & Colman, I. (2013). Assessment of self-harm risk using implicit thoughts (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 714-721. doi:10.1037/a0032391

Rockstuhl, T., Seiler, S., Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Annen, H. (2011). Beyond general intelligence (IQ) and emotional intelligence (EQ): The Role of cultural intelligence (CQ) on cross-border leadership effectiveness in a globalized world. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4). 825-840. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Sellbom, M., Anderson, J. L., & Bagby, R. M. (2013). Assessing DSM-5 Section III personality traits and disorders with the MMPI-2-RF. Assessment,20(6), 709-722. doi:10.1177/1073191113508808

Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2014a). Building better organizations: Industrial-organizational psychology in the workplace (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/visibilitybrochure/memberbrochure.aspx

Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2014b). Maximizing human potential within organizations: Learning the science behind talent management (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/visibilitybrochure/visibility.aspx

Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2014c). Top minds and bottom lines: What can I-O psychology do for your business? (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/visibilitybrochure/topminds.aspx

U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (2006). Testing and assessment: A guide to good practices for workforce investment professionals (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.[PDF]. Retrieved from http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/attach/TEN/ten2007/TEN21-07a1.pdf

Volkmar, F., Siegel, M., Woodbury-Smith, M. King, B., McCracken, J., State, M., & the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) Committee on Quality Issues (CQI). (2014). Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [PDF]. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(2), 237-257. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.10.013

Youngstrom, E. A. (2013). Future directions in psychological assessment: Combining evidence-based medicine innovations with psychology’s historical strengths to enhance utility. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. 42(1), 139-159. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2012.736358.

Multimedia

de Rossier, L. (Producer) & Boutinard-Rouelle, P. (Director). (2011). IQ: A history of deceit (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://fod.infobase.com/OnDemandEmbed.aspx?Token=52818&aid=18596&Plt=FOD&loid=0&w=640&h=480&ref

Moloney, C. (Writer), Breitenmoser, K. (Director), & De Robbio, M. (Producer). (2013).Psychometric testing and employment. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://fod.infobase.com/OnDemandEmbed.aspx?Token=53207&aid=18596&Plt=FOD&loid=0&w=640&h=480&ref

Web Pages

American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct including 2010 amendments: Standard 9: Assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx?item=12

American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct: Standard 9: Assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx?item=12

American Psychological Association. (2010). Standard 9: Assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx?item=12

University of Iowa Geriatric Education Center. (2014). Geriatric Assessment Tools: Dementia and Delirium (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Retrieved from http://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/igec/tools/categoryMenu.asp?categoryID=1

Websites

Storybird (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (http://storybird.com/)

Storybird Help Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (http://help.storybird.com/)

Supplemental Materials

Ashford University Career Services (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

(http://www.ashford.edu/student_services/careerservices.htm)

Harper, Y. (2014a). PSY640 Checklist for evaluating tests [PDF]. College of Health and Human Services, Ashford University, San Diego, CA.

Harper, Y. (2014b). PSY640 Content for Testing Pamphlets and Information Sheets (Links to an external site.) View in a new window[PDF]. College of Health, Ashford University: San Diego, CA.

Herron, T. (2014). Storybird quick-start guide (Links to an external site.) [PDF]. Ashford University: San Diego, CA.

Kennedy, N., & Harper Y. (2014a). PSY640 Week four psychological assessment report (Links to an external site.) [PDF]. College of Health and Human Services, Ashford University, San Diego, CA.

Kennedy, N., & Harper, Y. (2014b). PSY640 Week six clinical neuropsychological report for Mr. W (Links to an external site.)View in a new window[PDF]. College of Health, Ashford University: San Diego, CA.  

Evaluating Objective and Projective Assessments

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review Chapters 8 and 9 in your textbook.

In this assignment, you will compare projective and objective methods of personality assessment. Research a minimum of three peer-reviewed articles that were published within the last 15 years on these techniques. In your paper, you will provide an evaluation of these techniques organized according to the outline provided below. Use information from your researched peer-reviewed articles and required sources to support your work in each section.

Section 1: Objective Personality Assessment

Define the term objective in objective methods of personality assessment.

Summarize the features of objective methods of personality assessment, and provide at least three examples of these types of measures.

Explain the assumptions on which objective methods are based, and provide an analysis of empirical research testing the validity of the assumptions you identified.

Appraise the research exploring the technical adequacy (i.e., reliability and validity) of objective tests.

Describe the impact of social and culture variability on the administration and interpretation of objective tests.

Section 2: Projective Personality Assessment

Define the term projective in projective methods of personality assessment.

Summarize the features of projective methods of personality assessment, and provide at least three examples of these types of measures.

Explain the assumptions on which projective methods are based, and provide an analysis of empirical research testing the validity of the assumptions you identified.

Appraise the research exploring the technical adequacy (i.e., reliability and validity) of projective tests.

Describe the impact of social and culture variability on the administration and interpretation of projective tests.

Section 3: Synthesis, Conclusions, and Recommendations

Write a brief one-paragraph scenario for a fictitious client. Include the following information: presenting concerns (reason for referral), age, gender, ethnicity, language(s), and any other significant information (e.g., military status, health issues, marital status, sexual orientation, etc.).

Debate the arguments supporting and opposing the use of projective and objective personality assessments with your identified client.

Select a minimum of one objective and one projective measure to use with your client. Compare the use of the selected projective and objective personality measures with your identified client.

Analyze the advantages and limitations of each assessment measure you selected.

Compose recommendations to improve the validity of personality assessment.

The Evaluation of Objective and Projective Measures of Personality

Must be four double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style. 

Must include a separate title page with the following:

Title of paper

Student’s name

Course name and number

Instructor’s name

Date submitted

Must use at least three peer-reviewed sources published within the last 15 years in addition to the course text.

Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style.

Text

Gregory, R. J. (2014). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

This text is a Constellation™ course digital materials (CDM) title.

E-Books

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Barnhill, J. W. (Ed.). (2014). DSM-5 Clinical Cases. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.

Articles

Ægisdóttir, S., White, M. J., Spengler, P. M., Maugherman, A. S., Anderson, L. A., Cook, R. S., Nichols, C. N.,…Rush, J. D. (2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(3), 341-382. doi:10.1177/0011000005285875

American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [PDF]. American Psychologist, 68(1), 7-19. doi:10.1037/a0029889

Baez, H. B. (2013). Personality tests in employment selection: Use with caution (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Cornell HR Review. Retrieved from 

http://www.cornellhrreview.org/personality-tests-in-employment-selection-use-with-caution/

Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2014a). Case description: Mr. I—Psychiatric inpatientinterpretive report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [PDF]. Retrieved from http://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/Assets/MMPI-2-RF/MMPI-2-RF_Interp_PsyInpatient.pdf

Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2014b). Case description: Mr. M—Forensic, pre-trial criminal score report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [PDF]. Retrieved from http://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/Assets/MMPI-2-RF/MMPI-2-RF_Score_ForensicPretrial.pdf

Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2014c). Case description: Ms. X—Forensic, neuropsychological score report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [PDF]. Retrieved from http://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/Assets/MMPI-2-RF/MMPI-2-RF_Score_ForensicNeuro.pdf

Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2014a). MMP1-2-RF Police Candidate Interpretive Report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.[PDF].

Retrieved from http://downloads.pearsonclinical.com/images/Assets/MMPI-2-RF/MMPI-2-RF-PCIR.pdf

Ekinci, B. (2014). The Relationship among Sternberg’s triarchic abilities, Gardner’s multiple intelligences, and academic achievement. Social Behavior & Personality, 42(4), 625-633. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2014.42.4.625

Elbulok-Charcape, M.M., Rabin, L.A., Spadaccini, A.T., & Barr, W.B. (2014). Trends in the neuropsychological assessment of ethnic/racial minorities: A survey of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(3), 353–361. doi:10.1037/a0035023

Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Morris, R. D., & Lyon, G. R. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of learning disabilities in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34(3), 506-522. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Grove, W. M., & Lloyd, M. (2006). Meehl’s contribution to clinical versus statistical prediction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(2), 192-194. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.115.2.192

Hampshire, A., Highfield, R. R., Parkin, B. L., & Owen, A. M. (2012). Fractionating human intelligence. Neuron, 76(6). 1225–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.022

Handel, R. W., & Archer, R. P. (2008). An investigation of the psychometric properties of the MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales with mental health inpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(3), 239-249. doi:10.1080/00223890701884954

Healthwise Staff. (2014). Mental health assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Retrieved from http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/mental-health-assessment

Hogan, J., Barrett, P., & Hogan, R. (2007). Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1270-1285. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1270

Johnson, R. (2013). Forensic and culturally responsive approach for the DSM-5: Just the FACTS. Journal of Theory Construction & Testing, 17(1), 18-22. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

McDermott, P. A., Watkins, M. W., & Rhoad, A. M. (2014). Whose IQ is it?—Assessor bias variance in high-stakes psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 207-214. doi: 10.1037/a0034832

Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Are we getting fooled again? Coming to terms with limitations in the use of personality tests for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 60(4), 1029-1049.

Peterson, M. H., Griffith, R. L., Isaacson, J. A., O’Connell, M. S., & Mangos, P. M. (2011). Applicant faking, social desirability, and the prediction of counterproductive work behaviors. Human Performance. 24(3), 270–290. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.580808

Randall, J. R., Rowe, B. H., Dong, K. A., Nock, M. K., & Colman, I. (2013). Assessment of self-harm risk using implicit thoughts (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 714-721. doi:10.1037/a0032391

Rockstuhl, T., Seiler, S., Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Annen, H. (2011). Beyond general intelligence (IQ) and emotional intelligence (EQ): The Role of cultural intelligence (CQ) on cross-border leadership effectiveness in a globalized world. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4). 825-840. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Sellbom, M., Anderson, J. L., & Bagby, R. M. (2013). Assessing DSM-5 Section III personality traits and disorders with the MMPI-2-RF. Assessment,20(6), 709-722. doi:10.1177/1073191113508808

Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2014a). Building better organizations: Industrial-organizational psychology in the workplace (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/visibilitybrochure/memberbrochure.aspx

Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2014b). Maximizing human potential within organizations: Learning the science behind talent management (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/visibilitybrochure/visibility.aspx

Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2014c). Top minds and bottom lines: What can I-O psychology do for your business? (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/visibilitybrochure/topminds.aspx

U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (2006). Testing and assessment: A guide to good practices for workforce investment professionals (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.[PDF]. Retrieved from http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/attach/TEN/ten2007/TEN21-07a1.pdf

Volkmar, F., Siegel, M., Woodbury-Smith, M. King, B., McCracken, J., State, M., & the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) Committee on Quality Issues (CQI). (2014). Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [PDF]. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(2), 237-257. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.10.013

Youngstrom, E. A. (2013). Future directions in psychological assessment: Combining evidence-based medicine innovations with psychology’s historical strengths to enhance utility. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. 42(1), 139-159. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2012.736358.

Multimedia

de Rossier, L. (Producer) & Boutinard-Rouelle, P. (Director). (2011). IQ: A history of deceit (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://fod.infobase.com/OnDemandEmbed.aspx?Token=52818&aid=18596&Plt=FOD&loid=0&w=640&h=480&ref

Moloney, C. (Writer), Breitenmoser, K. (Director), & De Robbio, M. (Producer). (2013).Psychometric testing and employment. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://fod.infobase.com/OnDemandEmbed.aspx?Token=53207&aid=18596&Plt=FOD&loid=0&w=640&h=480&ref

Web Pages

American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct including 2010 amendments: Standard 9: Assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx?item=12

American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct: Standard 9: Assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx?item=12

American Psychological Association. (2010). Standard 9: Assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx?item=12

University of Iowa Geriatric Education Center. (2014). Geriatric Assessment Tools: Dementia and Delirium (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Retrieved from http://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/igec/tools/categoryMenu.asp?categoryID=1

Websites

Storybird (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (http://storybird.com/)

Storybird Help Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (http://help.storybird.com/)

Supplemental Materials

Ashford University Career Services (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

(http://www.ashford.edu/student_services/careerservices.htm)

Harper, Y. (2014a). PSY640 Checklist for evaluating tests [PDF]. College of Health and Human Services, Ashford University, San Diego, CA.

Harper, Y. (2014b). PSY640 Content for Testing Pamphlets and Information Sheets (Links to an external site.) View in a new window[PDF]. College of Health, Ashford University: San Diego, CA.

Herron, T. (2014). Storybird quick-start guide (Links to an external site.) [PDF]. Ashford University: San Diego, CA.

Kennedy, N., & Harper Y. (2014a). PSY640 Week four psychological assessment report (Links to an external site.) [PDF]. College of Health and Human Services, Ashford University, San Diego, CA.

Kennedy, N., & Harper, Y. (2014b). PSY640 Week six clinical neuropsychological report for Mr. W (Links to an external site.)View in a new window[PDF]. College of Health, Ashford University: San Diego, CA.

US Custom Writers
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with Us

Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.

Free Unlimited Revisions

If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & Confidential

We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.

24/7 Customer Support

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.

Admissions

Admission Essays & Business Writing Help

An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.

Reviews

Editing Support

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

Reviews

Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.